On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > The kFreeBSD ports are now in a good enough shape to be included in > unstable. Aur?lien Jarno got ftpmaster's approval for that during an > informal conversation at debconf5 [1] but so far, there's been no > progress on this front. http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386 seems to list under three DDs actively involved in the port, about 40 systems in total using it, and 20% of the archive unbuildable. I don't really see how it would benefit from being added to the archive, tbh: it looks like a niche distribution that's working fine as it is. Personally, due to things like [0], I tend to think having different sources for different OSes is likely to make sense; which isn't something we can manage with the main archive as it stands. Cheers, aj [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00012.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature