On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Hence, what is your position on including those new, non-Linux ports ? Favourable. > What would the timeframe be like, according to you ? I see no reason to wait a single day more. For newer ports not already mentioned, I would like to make the process even faster. Provided the maintainers for it are here, once a bootstrapping process and a build daemon exist, the port should benefit from our infrastructure (build.d.o, bugs.d.o, ftp archive) as soon as possible. > If an ftpmaster was to charge an amount of money to include the new > architectures (as was the case for amd64), what would, according to > you, be a reasonable amount ? I don't know. How much is a pony nowadays? Regards, -- Sam.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature