Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads
Neil McGovern <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:20:24PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Neil McGovern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > > Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens to
> > > > the DPL, not the project?
> > >
> > > I'll extract the exact line from the above text for you:
> > > ... state the SPI Board's current understanding of who is authorised to
> > > act for the project ...
> > >
> > > In this case, the DPL.
> > Is that an official statement of the SPI board?
> No, it's my reading of the resolution as a Debian Developer.
In other words: this doesn't show anything that supports the claim that
'SPI usually has a defined authorisationship with an associated project,
this refers to people, not the project as a whole or their developers
or their internal voting results' applies to debian, or that SPI's
current understanding is that only the DPL is authorised to act.
I know that most of SPI's recently-invited projects have been benevolent
dictatorships, but I also know that SPI resolved to follow the OFTC
constitution, so I don't see why SPI won't follow the debian one.
SPI's project framework claims non-interference in project internal
decision-making processes, so I suggest that Joey was mistaken.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct