Re: Anton's amendment
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:16:40AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:
>
> > If your interpretation does not require any list of exceptions than
> > your interpretation makes GPL and many other licenses non-free. You
> > are free to have such interpretation but you have no right to call it
> > obvious reading of DFSG.
>
> The GPL does not place any restrictions on which sections of the
> program may be changed.
Yes. I am not arguing that the invariant sections are better than the
restriction in GPL. What I am arguing is that "the license must allow
arbitrary modifications without list of exceptions" makes GPL to be
non-free license.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: