Re: Anton's amendment

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:36:09PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> 
>> Can you please explain then where the DFSG contains any statement of
>> limitation on the concept of modifiability?  Where does it allow for
>> any limitations on modifiability?
>> 
>> More specifically: if there is such a limitation in the text, surely
>> it must be clear whether the limitation is:
>
> I consider this an argument in favour of my interpretation.  It is
> clear and doesn't require any exceptions in the applicability of DFSG.
> Your interpretation ("arbitrary modifications") requires list of
> exceptions so I can ask: why DFSG doesn't contain any hints about such
> exceptions.

What?  My interpretation does not require any list of exceptions,
because there is no such list.