Re: Anton's amendment
Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:17:54PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Yavor Doganov <yavor@doganov.org> writes:
>>
>> > No, I think that Anton Zinoviev's amendment to the GR does *not*
>> > require a change to the DFSG.
>>
>> For this to be true, it must seem like a plausible interpretation of
>> the words of the DFSG. Can you work me through this then, since I
>> (and others) are so lunk-headed that we have not seen it?
>
> Everybody has the right to have his own opinion. I do not insist that
> you have to acknowledge my interpretation as plausible. The point is
> that
>
> 1. There is absolutely no decision in the Debian project that would
> make my interpretation invalid.
>
> 2. My interpretation is supported by some Debian developers (and
> probably by many Debian developers).
Excuse me, what exactly is your interpretation? And I don't mean "The
GFDL is free", but a general statement which modifications DFSG 3
requires to be allowed.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: