Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:40:32PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On 2/1/06, Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> wrote:
> > This interpretation is not ad-hoc thing and I strongly belive that it
> > represents not only my view but also the view of FSF. I asked Richard
> > Stallman for confirmation and I will report here when I receive his
> > reply.
>
> RMS has NO POWER to decide in Debian. We are talking about the DFSG.
So do I. But I had to disprove that my interpretation is ad-hoc.
> What is it that you are going to ask from him? To confirm what we
> already know? That the FSF regards the GFDL as a free licence, no
> matter what?
I asked if the second interpretation of DFSG expresses properly what
modifications must be allowed about a particular software program or
documentation for it to be considered free by FSF.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: