Re: Anton's amendment
Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:
> Not everybody reads the text as you so it is just an interpretation.
This is not sufficient. You must explain how your interpretation is
more plausible or likely. If it is just an ad-hoc thing, designed
only to get the particular conclusion you want for this case, then
Manoj is on solid ground.
I have not yet seen such an interpretation of this sort, in which
explanation and analysis of similar cases and such is proffered. This
does not mean it cannot be done, but it has not.
Thomas
Reply to: