Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:39:12AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> The DFSG says *nothing* about "functional parts", and was recently
> amended *specifically* to clarify that the same conditions apply to
> software and programs.
I have never objected this decision.
> To interpret the DFSG to read into it language about functional parts
> or to have different standards for programs and documentation, is to
> insert something that is simply not there.
I do not interpret DFSG that way. If I decide to create a package
with some essays from www.gnu.org that package would be free acording
to FSF and non-free acording to DFSG (because these essays are not
modifiable). I have no problems with that.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: