Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:13:05AM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Sure, it says it must permit modifications, but it doesn't way that it must
> permit ALL modifications. The way it reads, literally, could be interpreted
> as it must permit ALL modifcations, or as it must permit at least two
> modifications (so that "modifications" is plural).
Are you seriously suggesting that a webserver which allows one to only
modify the name it advertizes and the path to the default configuration
file is Free?
--
.../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/
../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/
-.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ /
../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../
---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/
Reply to: