Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:38:25PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:20:31AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> writes:
> >
> > > Not everybody reads the text as you so it is just an interpretation.
> >
> > This is not sufficient. You must explain how your interpretation is
> > more plausible or likely. If it is just an ad-hoc thing, designed
> > only to get the particular conclusion you want for this case, then
> > Manoj is on solid ground.
> >
> > I have not yet seen such an interpretation of this sort, in which
> > explanation and analysis of similar cases and such is proffered. This
> > does not mean it cannot be done, but it has not.
>
> This interpretation is not ad-hoc thing and I strongly belive that it
> represents not only my view but also the view of FSF.
Again, the view of the FSF is of no relevance to the Debian project.
This is true just as much as the view of the FSF is of no relevance to,
say, Microsoft Corp.
Which of course is not to say that Debian is similar to Microsoft, but
you get the idea.
--
.../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/
../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/
-.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ /
../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../
---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/
Reply to: