Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:13:05AM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> > Sure, it says it must permit modifications, but it doesn't way
> > that it must permit ALL modifications. The way it reads,
> > literally, could be interpreted as it must permit ALL
> > modifcations, or as it must permit at least two modifications (so
> > that "modifications" is plural).
>
> Are you seriously suggesting that a webserver which allows one to only
> modify the name it advertizes and the path to the default configuration
> file is Free?
Nobody is suggesting that. The point is that DFSG allow many
interpretations and the Debian developers have to decide which one is
the correct one.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: