Re: Summary? (Or: my vote is for sale!)
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:48:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It would serve as summary, if nothing else. But we also had a discussion with
> > the DPL, who suggested a new GR which could be signed by the kernel team, the
> > d-i team and the RMs (signed = seconded here).
> While we were discussing that, Manoj proposed an amendment to Frederik's
> proposal that seems to have achieved consensus amongst the various folks
No, because it is unclear. I personally strongly oppose Manoj's amendments in
its current form, because it is clear to me that it means something else than
what people want to actually happen.
> who care, which seems like the ideal outcome to me. As long as there's
> a proposal that roughly meets the concerns of the kernel, boot, RM and
> -legal folks, I'm perfectly happy.
Ok, so let's improve on Manoj's amendment, taking the actual content of the
draft position statement as a basis, and then we will have a consensus.
But standalone, Manoj's proposal will leave us in a worse mess, because it
will be interpreted differently to different people, and in particular it
means the removal of the tg3 driver, which was not what is intented.