Re: Summary? (Or: my vote is for sale!)
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:48:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It would serve as summary, if nothing else. But we also had a discussion with
> > the DPL, who suggested a new GR which could be signed by the kernel team, the
> > d-i team and the RMs (signed = seconded here).
>
> While we were discussing that, Manoj proposed an amendment to Frederik's
> proposal that seems to have achieved consensus amongst the various folks
No, because it is unclear. I personally strongly oppose Manoj's amendments in
its current form, because it is clear to me that it means something else than
what people want to actually happen.
> who care, which seems like the ideal outcome to me. As long as there's
> a proposal that roughly meets the concerns of the kernel, boot, RM and
> -legal folks, I'm perfectly happy.
Ok, so let's improve on Manoj's amendment, taking the actual content of the
draft position statement as a basis, and then we will have a consensus.
But standalone, Manoj's proposal will leave us in a worse mess, because it
will be interpreted differently to different people, and in particular it
means the removal of the tg3 driver, which was not what is intented.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: