Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 14:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > > I like the idea, but it eliminates some choices for the voter. With > > this setup, it is not possible to prioritize the firmware removal > > over the release, while still considering other options > > acceptable. How would I be able to express the following: > > Since the issues are orthogonal, you could vote for "DFSG #2 > applies to all programmatic works" . There is no conflict between > that and releasing etch, with or without special exceptions; so > ranking vs that and releases does not seem to make sense. This leads to a case of tactical voting. If I prefer my proposal over Frederik's, but I'd prefer that none of them would pass, I should still put mine before NOTA to give it a better chance to hit 3:1. I know I'm nitpicking, but isn't this whole thread about nitpicking? ;) -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=