Re: Let's vote ...
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:45:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > come to an agreement about what exactly in that email
> > constitutes the actual general resolution?
>
> This:
>
> 1. We affirm that our Priorities are our users and the free software
> community (Social Contract #4);
> 2. We acknowledge that there is a lot of progress in the kernel firmware
> issue; however, it is not yet finally sorted out;
> 3. We give priority to the timely release of Etch over sorting every bit
> out; for this reason, we will deliver firmware in udebs as long as it is
> necessary for installation (like all udebs), and firmware included in
> the kernel itself as part of Debian Etch, without further conditions.
Since it seems we need to resecond this or something :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
1. We affirm that our Priorities are our users and the free software
community (Social Contract #4);
2. We acknowledge that there is a lot of progress in the kernel firmware
issue; however, it is not yet finally sorted out;
3. We give priority to the timely release of Etch over sorting every bit
out; for this reason, we will deliver firmware in udebs as long as it is
necessary for installation (like all udebs), and firmware included in
the kernel itself as part of Debian Etch, without further conditions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFFDt+2WTeT3CRQaQRAsNzAJ97FIj7ZOHC5apthxAHz7dCOt+ZSgCeLfx5
gq/4w746M0iyIldgroFrng8=
=iDwI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: