Re: Let's vote ...
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:40:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:21:12 +0200, Sven Luther <email@example.com> said:
> > This issue remains, and it is still not solved. This has got the
> > approval of Steve Langasek (who said that his proposal and this
> > where orthogonal and a separate GR), of our DPL, who said he would
> > postpone his own GR proposal for post etch, as well as the proposer
> > of this GR.
> > There also is clearly no amendment proposal of this GR, only of the
> > various and numerous other GR proposals out there, and it is clear
> > now that we either have to have a period of calm and reflection
> > before going ahead, which is better done once etch is released, or
> > sit back and see various well-thinking DDs filibustering the vote
> > process upto irrelevance.
> Have there been seconds for this proposal that I have missed?
> And, as to timing, I think that the usual minimal discussion and
> voting period applies, unless the DPL intervenes, of course.
Original proposal :
From: Frederik Schueler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:06:54 +0200
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:20:41 +0200
From: martin f krafft <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:38:04 +0200
From: Bas Zoetekouw <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:39:46 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:42:57 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Sylvain Le Gall <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:56:22 +0200
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:50:11 +0200
From: Enrico Zini <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:19:49 +0100
From: Daniel Ruoso <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:20:31 -0300
From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
That is 8 signed seconds (altough i didn't check the signatures), within 48
hours of the proposal which is now 24 days old.
Is there something else missing ?