On Tuesday 22 August 2006 07:23, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:56:43AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: ... > > AFAICT the DPL already does authorise such expenses > > now. So, why is it so complicated to just drop a line on some mailing > > list when this is done? > > That's not at all complicated, but that alone doesn't solve the problem > that bothers me most. Ah, ok. I was, indeed, focusing on the expenses stuff. But I see what you meen, now. > FWIW, I don't count one guy maintaining some web pages to make the > information easily accessible as bureaucracy. :) Ok, you got me here... :-) But more effort than I perceived was necessary for a simple task. But taking your view into account, I can see that you'd want a person doing this stuff, and certainly wouldn't want to stand in Kalle's way, having a good overview of Debian's assets is certainly necessary. > [0] Personally, I'd rather see expenditures listed on their own (public) > website than posted to -private or -project or -devel-announce. YMMV, > though I don't think I've seen any suggestions. d-d-a and d-project are quite high profile, so I agree that we probably shouldn't use these for purely administrative messages. cheers -- vbi -- Protect your privacy - encrypt your email: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro
Attachment:
pgp3TLIJu4e7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature