Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:20:13 +0200, Bernhard R Link <email@example.com> said:
>> * Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> [060723 23:50]:
>>> So not giving the SPI board oversight on how Debian conducts it's
>>> internal affairs is sending an unfortunate message? Perhaps I do
>>> think we should send such a message; and indeed, we should consider
>>> the creation of a Debian Foundation, more sensitive to our eeds,
>>> with a constitution that precludes it interfering with our modus
>>> operandi or else it feels offended.
>> Thanks for making clear the GR is not about some issue or topic but
>> to drive some of your personal rants.
> I strongly uge you to actually read the discussion on the
> contents of the GR, and correct your gross misunderstanding of the
> issues involved before actually voting on this issue.
Indeed - the discussion so far (and as far as I read it) does not back
Bernhard's interpretation. There's been a sensible request to give one
of the entities which this amendment talks about the opportunity to
comment. I find your reaction to this very strange.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)