Re: Reflections about the questions for the candidates
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 01:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Uh, for one thing, "email@example.com" != "DPL Team".
> Maybe it would have been a good idea then to publicize a point of
> contact for your team. You did not, therefore I think Enrico is wrongly
> annoyed by the lack of input to the team.
I agree that in hindsight, that should've happened. The DPL preferred
otherwise, and a consideration was that it was easily for people to just
mail the people involved, as email addresses of DD's can be looked up.
Several people did so, but not many.
> I definately believe that the DPL-team is a good initiative and should
> be continued; at the same time I also believe that the past year should
> have taught some lessons on what can be improved. Communication is an
> important one. Make sure people can actually contact you, and make it
> clear that you sollicit input. And when you get it, actually respond to
> it, even if it's just a short note, which is a world of difference with
> no response at all.
I'll have leader@ be forwarded to the whole team.
In addition, I'll *actively* sollicit feedback every 3 months, and post
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)