Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:12:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:59:30PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:10:29PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > > > Feb 6th, Joey mails indicating he'd like to release the update
> > > > > at the end of Feb (27th/28th) or a little bit later at
> > > > > the end of February. "let me know if this is ok for
> > > > > you - or if this is not ok for you"
> > > > I note that it took you 16 days to reply,
> > > It wasn't a reply to Joey's mail, which I hadn't thought had needed a
> > > reply.
> > <expletive>. You have even _QUOTED_ the direct question asked by Joey.
> > Will you think questions as "not needing a reply" as a DPL as well?
>
> Like I said, I didn't think it needed a reply.
Am I the only one who sees this as a misconception of epic proportions?
> I'm not perfect, and I
> do misread things occassionally -- I quoted the above, because I just
> went back and looked at Joey's original mail, and I thought that was
> relevant, both in the the fact that a request for a response was made,
> and it wasn't indicated that it was particularly important.
Hm. You consider a timely point release unimportant?
> > Did you talk to the stable release manager before trying to reduce his
> > work load?
>
> Of course I did.
In the last four weeks?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
Reply to: