On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:02:01AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:16:43PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > Quoting Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>: > > > > Well, maybe the people who mislabeled the "everything is software" vote > > > > as an "editorial change" and deceived many other developers should have > > > > tought about this. > > > The only people it made happy are extremists. See #207932. > > Yes, thanks, that's a great example of how there are people on both sides of > > this issue that are capable of acting like children. > > Pass on giving it a second reading, it was nauseating enough to see it come > > through my mailbox the first time. > I'm glad you enjoyed. It was a great fun. But, you know, since I'm not > subscribed to -legal, I had to find another way. There was a choice between > simply closing the silly bug, or playing a bit with extremists for free (as > beer!!!) Yeah, um, if you had closed the bug, I would have reopened it immediately. Unless you persuade the release managers that the GFDL complies with the DFSG, amend the DFSG so that it *does* comply, or invoke the technical committee, this is a release-critical issue for etch as listed on <http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt>; playing BTS tennis isn't going to make that go away. I'm sorry, but whether something is a release-critical bug is just not your decision to make personally. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature