Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

To: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:16:43 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1139483803.43eb249b90826@imp6-g19.free.fr>
Reply-to: jerome.marant@free.fr
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060209085909.GA6144@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <86lkxc33g0.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <200601191933.08621.chrsmrtn@debian.org> <20060120013926.GK30495@archimedes.ucr.edu> <200601192111.12920.chrsmrtn@debian.org> <[🔎] 20060208082136.GA18038@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com> <[🔎] d0461dbe0602080850n1c7b4b4eo99f8bde5216f76d9@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20060209030532.GB28269@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com> <[🔎] 87d5hxyyki.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060209040539.GA14545@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 877j85yvpc.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060209085909.GA6144@wonderland.linux.it>

Quoting Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>:

> Well, maybe the people who mislabeled the "everything is software" vote
> as an "editorial change" and deceived many other developers should have
> tought about this.

The only people it made happy are extremists.  See #207932.  This is a
very good example of the silliness it leads to.  You won't be surprised
to see the same fundamentalists as involved in debian-legal crusades.

I'd propose to revert this and clearly define what software is.

--
Jérôme Marant

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Xavier Roche <roche@httrack.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Next by Date: Re: GFDL GR: Amendment: invariant-less in main v2
Previous by thread: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Next by thread: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread