Re: Question for candidate Robinson
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> and the early reaction of debian-legal when i first joined this disastrous
> topic was not one to make debian-legal shine [...]
Probably not. The first reaction of Sven Luther wasn't good either.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg00363.html
> Clearly many of the debian-legal people
> take their wish for realities,
..and clearly Sven has a mind-reading device.
> and the fact that they are usually unopposed
> comes mostly because they have more times to lose than others,
..or because most people agree when things are correct.
> and usually
> discourage reasonable people from participating constructively.
..when "reasonable" means "reasonably-large-flamethrower-holding".
> > [...] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html
> [...] the above was nothing but an ad-hominem attack on me
> just because i didn't curb myself and bow to the all powerfull
> consensus of debian-legal time-losers ?
I think you'll find he attacked your past actions more than
anything else.
The low number of drinking games suggest that it takes more than
just disagreeing to get that response.
Reply to: