Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Debian Project Secretary (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040523 23:55]:
> > I do not think we can over ride the constitution, and other
> > foundation documents, with a simple position statement; so I would
> > not think a simple position statement can trump the SC.
> I think we can override it with a position statement that has the same
> requirements as a change of the fundation document, i.e. this position
> statement would require a 3:1-majority.
What is the constitutional basis for you thinking this?