Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Could you explain why this paragraph in proposal E is
> > insufficient?
> > " In the specific case of General Resolution 2004_003, since that
> > release currently in preparation, code named "Sarge", is very close to
> > release, and the previously released version is quite out of date, our
> > commitment to our users dictates that the "Sarge" release should go on
> > as planned - even while we are in the process of reaching compliance
> > with the new Social Contract. This exemption for "Sarge" applies to
> > security releases and point releases as well."
> That one is fine -- I just forgot about that part of it.
> This is good enough that I'm now thinking I don't need to propose a
> new GR.
Have you seen Bill Alombert's objections  to Manoj's proposal? It
seems that Manoj's proposal assumes, like most of the others, that the
changes to the current social contract are not editorial.