Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Could you explain why this paragraph in proposal E is
> > insufficient?
> >
> > " In the specific case of General Resolution 2004_003, since that
> > release currently in preparation, code named "Sarge", is very close to
> > release, and the previously released version is quite out of date, our
> > commitment to our users dictates that the "Sarge" release should go on
> > as planned - even while we are in the process of reaching compliance
> > with the new Social Contract. This exemption for "Sarge" applies to
> > security releases and point releases as well."
>
> That one is fine -- I just forgot about that part of it.
>
> This is good enough that I'm now thinking I don't need to propose a
> new GR.
Have you seen Bill Alombert's objections [1] to Manoj's proposal? It
seems that Manoj's proposal assumes, like most of the others, that the
changes to the current social contract are not editorial.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/05/msg00329.html
--
gram
Reply to: