On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:22:22AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Nevertheless, as things stand the decision is made; unless _something_ > > changes, sarge won't release with DFSG-free docs. At present, though, ^^^^ non-DFSG-free docs, duh. > > very little is being done to follow through on that. > I beg to differ. Debian have ongoing discussion with the FSF on this issue, > see <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/04/msg06892.html> for the > status. To give a chance to this discussion, we agreed on postponing > action (splitting of packages, position statement) until the discussion > reach a conclusion. The original agreement was superceded by the social contract changes, and affected more than just GFDL docs. The appropriate reference was http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt. That reference hasn't been changed to reflect the new social contract, and the new policy isn't being acted upon yet, since this whole thing's still under discussion, though. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Description: Digital signature