[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Summary: Proposal - Rescind GR 2004-003

On Thu, 6 May 2004 19:10:37 -0400, Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> said: 

> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>> this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?

> There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be
> seconded.

	Not formal requirements, no. I just like to ensure that I
 know where the rationale came from, and whether the sponsors signed
 on to it (I don't want to be caught in between a dispute in wording)

Never say you know a man until you have divided an inheritance with
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: