[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Summary: Proposal - Rescind GR 2004-003

On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:10:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >  * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
> >    this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
> There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be
> seconded.
> Personally, I don't agree with all of the statements which have been
> prosposed as rationale, I think it's enough to point out that other
> people think they are significant.

In order to reflect this fact, I used 
  "rationale raised for this proposal"

So if you have better expression for this to reflect the situation, I
will appreciate your suggestion.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: