On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:10:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
> > this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
>
> There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be
> seconded.
>
> Personally, I don't agree with all of the statements which have been
> prosposed as rationale, I think it's enough to point out that other
> people think they are significant.
In order to reflect this fact, I used
"rationale raised for this proposal"
^^^^^^
So if you have better expression for this to reflect the situation, I
will appreciate your suggestion.
Osamu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature