[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:
> > no, it demonstrates that if you presume to insult me then i will
> > give at least as good as i get. 
> [...]
> > do not attempt to communicate with me again. i have no interest whatsoever in
> > corresponding with an arsewipe like you.

you obviously can't understand simple instructions.  i'll give them to you once
more just in case some faint glimmer of understanding manages to seep in:


> It's delightful to see one's point made over and over again.  
> Further demonstration that Craig can't take it.  A recap:
> In the previous GR, Craig loudly insisted that if his side won, it would be
> totally unacceptable for anyone to continue the discussion.

once again you are lying.

i did no such thing.

the thread you are grossly misrepresenting here was me stating (too late) that
there should have been a "None of the Above" option on the ballot, which would
effectively be a "Shut The Fuck Up" about it option to balance the "More
Discussion" option.

but facts are very flexible and the truth too inconvenient for a lying sack of
shit like you, aren't they?

> In the current one, Craig didn't get his way, and so he declares that his
> opponents are immoral and unprincipled.  

you have demonstrated that you personally are morally bankrupt, unethical,
and unprincipled time and time again.  it is seemingly impossible for you
to say anything without lying and/or grossly distorting the truth.

> And, delightfully, he does so in messages that demonstrate his own inability
> to behave like a decent human being.

here's news for you from the real world: using words like "shit" and "arsewipe"
do not indicate one's human status.

if you can't deal with this harsh truth, then fuck off back to the

more to the point, if you can't stand the heat then don't leap into the fire
(even the most stupid of children usually learn this by the age of 5 or so.
you must be significantly slower on the uptake than that).  if you think i'm
going to just sit back and let you get away with it when you insult and slander
me then you are fucking wrong.

> Once again Craig, thank you for your excellent proof of my points.

you have no points.  all you have are lies.  generally very tiresome ones.


craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

The next time you vote, remember that "Regime change begins at home"

Reply to: