Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
Craig Sanders <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> either the recently changed wording of the SC is good & correct, in which
> case the principled thing to do is to follow it without exception, or it
> is not correct, in which case it should be discarded.
Or, it's a good idea as an ultimate goal, but we don't mind having one
more release which doesn't meet that goal, provided the one after that
Since you have shown yourself to be an unprincipled cad, the notion of
you lecturing decent people about ethics is ironic in the extreme.