[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003



On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 01:47:57PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:09:36PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:45:18AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > The Debian Project,

> > > > affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> > > > distributes,

> > > > but recognizing that changing the Social Contract today would have grave
> > > > consequences for the upcoming stable release, a fact which does not
> > > > serve our goals or the interests of our users,

> > > > hereby resolves:

> > > > 1. that the amendments to the Social Contract contained within the
> > > >    General Resolution "Editorial Amendments To The Social Contract"
> > > >    (2004 vote 003) be immediately rescinded;
> > > > 2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the Debian
> > > >    Project, will be reinstated effective as of September 1, 2004 without
> > > >    further cause for deliberation.

> > > i propose an amendment that deletes everything but clause 1 of this proposal,
> > > so that the entire proposal now reads:

> > >    that the amendments to the Social Contract contained within the
> > >    General Resolution "Editorial Amendments To The Social Contract"
> > >    (2004 vote 003) be immediately rescinded.

> > I do, of course, reject this amendment. :)

> the problem with your (unamended) proposal is that it is unprincipled and
> unethical.  my amendment fixes that.

I'm sorry, you seem to have mistaken the smile in my previous message for an
invitation for you to continue being a prat in public.  Please allow me to
clarify:  the smiley was directed at those sensible folks who can appreciate the
humor of explicitly rejecting such an obviously incompatible amendment, which
disqualifies you on two counts.

> while the Knights Lunar like to pretend that they are Holier Than Stallman,
> they have little understanding of ethics or principles, and have no regard for
> the consequences of their ill-considered jihad.

I shall take your word for it, as you do certainly appear to be the foremost
authority on the Knights Lunar.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: