[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:06:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:49:12 +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> said: 
> > I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation
> > of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of
> 	It certainly was against what I took the social contract to
>  be. I never imagined that Debian was about only part of main being
>  free, indeed, as Bruce has stated, I, too, was under the impression
>  that the  SC and the DFSG applied to everything on the Debian CD.

I do not see how it can be maintained that these were "editorial changes"
when there is clearly a significant number of developers who believe that
the meaning of the Social Contract was changed (to the point of forcing
action that was not forced before).

 - mdz

Reply to: