Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:06:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:49:12 +1000, Anthony Towns <email@example.com> said:
> > I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation
> > of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of
> It certainly was against what I took the social contract to
> be. I never imagined that Debian was about only part of main being
> free, indeed, as Bruce has stated, I, too, was under the impression
> that the SC and the DFSG applied to everything on the Debian CD.
I do not see how it can be maintained that these were "editorial changes"
when there is clearly a significant number of developers who believe that
the meaning of the Social Contract was changed (to the point of forcing
action that was not forced before).