On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:29:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > No, the exception is _entirely_ due to the fact that we don't > > require documentation, data, or firmware to be free. And > > debian-legal is not a delegated body, and is unable to make > > decisions of their own that have any relevance to Debian -- those > > decisions are made by the DPL, and the appointed delegates in charge > > of handling the archive. > I am surprised to hear you say that, since I would personally > have thought that was against the spirit of the social contract. I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of my knowledge the interpretation of anyone else responsible in that area. I'm sorry if you feel reasonable people can't hold such opinions. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature