Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I'm referring to the sub threads where people ask what non-free has that
> > anyone needs.
>
> Oh, I figure they're just ignorant--and likely to be unaware of what
> vrms would say on their own system.
>
> Incidentally, so it was recently pointed out to me that I don't need
> mpg123, because mpg321 is free and a drop-in replacement.
>
> So why is mpg123 in the non-free area anymore? Is anyone willing to
> say it's necessary? And if not, why didn't it get dropped sooner?
>
> See, this is what I'm thinking when I'm told that things are just fine
> now.
Well, let's investigate and remove it if needed.
Did you fill a bug report against mpg123 asking for just that ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: