Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Did you fill a bug report against mpg123 asking for just that ?
Is it a bug? Currently, there is no sense in my mind in which
"unnecessarly in non-free" constitutes a bug. We have no policy, of
any kind, which says that only necessary things should be in non-free.
What is the bug?
On the other hand, if you want to create such a policy, I'm all for
it. Indeed, that's *exactly* what I've been suggesting as one
possible approach to take, should the pending GR fail.
Thomas
Reply to: