Re: Proposal: Keep non-free
On 2004-02-24 19:01:06 +0000 Raul Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
How do you measure "increased demand"?
You cannot measure it directly, but you can measure its effects as you
say, through observing user requests.
Yes, that's not direct, but nor is the hypothesis that "In the future,
we can probably expect non-free to be the only way we can distribute
such things as the GNU Manuals and Centrino wireless drivers" that I
was responding to. How can any advocate of non-free say that there
will never be free equivalents of these?
If my argument is too weak, so is the original. That's not great, but
However, if any software had that as a condition of distribution, that
software could only be distributed in non-free.
As you have pointed out before, the project and the distribution are
different. I think the project is already not "DFSG-like free": it
discriminates against certain fields of endeavour in some ways. It
would be difficult to do otherwise. Your claim seems very obvious. I
don't think the DFSG are supposed to apply to the project, only the
distribution, but ICBW.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/