Re: GR status

[MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>]

On 2004-02-24 18:31:41 +0000 Debian Project secretary 
<srivasta@debian.org> wrote:

>                The Rationale for the amendment is also available. 
> This 
> amedment only requires a simple majority to pass.

Does this mean that it only needs a simple majority over the original, 
or that the amended GR would only need a simple majority over the 
default? Please note that Towns's amendment does not delete the 
Suffield's drop GR's change to the SC.

It would be rather ugly if it is easier to pass Suffield+Towns and 
leave us with a worse situation on non-free than Suffield's drop 
failing to get supermajority.