Re: non-free and users?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: non-free and users?
- From: MJ Ray <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:53:31 +0000
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20040119142047.GA21620@iliana>
On 2004-01-19 14:20:47 +0000 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
I want you to stop this diffamation, and retract your unfunded
First, it was offered as comment. Second, justification for why he
regards it as unethical was given. Finally, I don't think there was
malice against you personally, or any other developer, as he took
pains to point out. I doubt many would consider it defamation, which
normally involves malicious presentation of falsehood as fact, as I
understand it. Further, I can't find a successful case being made for
describing something as "unethical" being defamation. IANAL, though.
I suggest you note your disagreement with his opinion and cease
posting to the list about it unless something new develops.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/