[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract



On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:06:35PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> This proposal replaces the amendment I submitted earlier today.  This
> version removes "Linux" from the title and spells out who the contract
> is with.  I also fix the grammatical mistake Sven found.
> 
> 
> We will change the title of the social contract to read:
> 
>   Debian's Social Contract with its Users
> 
> We will change parts 1 and 5 of the social contract to read as follows:
> 
>   1. Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software
> 
>      Debian exists to distribute a general purpose system composed of
>      entirely free software.  As there are many definitions of free
>      software, we use the "Debian Free Software Guidelines" to determine
>      if software is free.  We will also support our users who develop
>      and run other software on Debian -- free or non-free -- but we will
>      never make the system depend on an item of non-free software.
> 
> and
> 
>   5. Programs That Don't Meet Our Free-Software Standards
> 
>      We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of programs
>      that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.  We
>      support interoperability standards such as "Linux System Base", and
>      will accept bug reports where our system violates those standards.
>      To make our system more attractive to people with mild dependencies
>      on non-free software, we have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas
>      in our internet archive.  The software in these directories is not
>      needed by most people, and we do not guarantee all software in the
>      non-free area may be distributed in other ways.  Thus, although
>      we're working to reduce people's dependence on non-free software,
>      we support users who are still dependent.  Additionally, we will
>      work to provide free alternatives to non-free software so people who
>      use only free software can work with users of non-free software.
> 
> - -- 
> Raul
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: noconv
> 
> iQEVAwUBQAHYYPK/+Baey4gJAQH2Ogf+PW4ZZnfPRxgIsRXuDk84fJC2c5hsQCIR
> HFMpO75l8leJntSsALF8FFwRFnC1xbg7L0htD5Hk4X58QzNmD5suLB3kCrJTndsf
> 5yitv3WMug4WFM91CCpjWBarpVtH9tXrHvrmG2HhIczJTIAQV470Jl+DoStqKO02
> IwbcZ3aCmQRqj2zA5G1e75No4m0aI/vf4ooqYveD0Zo7J5IWePusFq3IZyMpVSJW
> OQEbBhZtUx3DNsYCBj1Y53wGOheDePbSbd2DjREUFJHIV1QRynNdOWwEYamaNBCk
> kssBh7w+BpqkHhjjHP2M9CiPOhRTqksoK451zqwihOXsASFvS5+Uew==
> =mkrq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I second this proposal.

I believe it is Raul's latest at this time.

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: