Re: Statistics on non-free usage
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:35:44AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:10:57AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:53:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:02:43PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > > It hasn't even done that; as I have had to use Java from third-party
> > > > repositories at work for some time and have not noticed it being any
> > > > lower quality that non-free packages in Debian.
> > >
> > > ah, because you used it on x86. wasn't that one of the arguments for
> > > removing non-free ?
> > Huh? I totally do not follow what you're saying here.
> See Michael Blank argumentation about non-x86 arch in non-free.
a) I'm called Michael Banck
b) I do not understand what you are trying to say, either