[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea



> > Note that debian-private also does not meet DFSG, and is not guaranteed
> > by the social contract.
> > 
> > If the only point here is that debian resources shouldn't be used to
> > distribute non-DFSG stuff we should place getting rid of debian-private
> > at a higher level of priority than non-free.

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:07:00PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> debian-private is fairly low-traffic. I think you mean "getting rid of
> non-public-list email", which includes listmaster, debian-admin, and
> all the developer addresses.

It's the restriction on redistribution that's at issue here.

-- 
Raul



Reply to: