On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:02:40AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2004, at 17:59, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > then by your logic, we must stop distributing GNU/FSF documentation, > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:40:58AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > If the committee currently working with the FSF on the issue does not > > resolve it, then yes. > > > > Works not meeting the DFSG can not go in main, and without non-free, > > they would not be distributed by Debian at all. > > Note that debian-private also does not meet DFSG, and is not guaranteed > by the social contract. > > If the only point here is that debian resources shouldn't be used to > distribute non-DFSG stuff we should place getting rid of debian-private > at a higher level of priority than non-free. debian-private is fairly low-traffic. I think you mean "getting rid of non-public-list email", which includes listmaster, debian-admin, and all the developer addresses. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature