Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:01:43AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2004, at 22:03, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >>
> >>I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it
> >>is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful.
> >
> >Prove that it isn't.
>
> It is the duty of the proponent to prove his arguments and demonstrate
> his assumptions.
You (and Andrew Suffield, John Goerzen etc) are advocating the removal
of non-free, so I believe the burden of proof is yours.
If you want to change the status quo, convince the voters.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: