[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:11:40PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:34:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 	We made a promise to users; and even called it a
> >  ``contract''.  Now we no longer want to keep that promise, so are we
> >  going to just leave the users in the lurch, with no transition plan,
> >  no support going forward? For people whoi seem to think that
> >  distributing non-DFSG free software is unethical, how ethicsal is
> >  this reneging on our promise?
> I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it
> is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful.

Prove that it isn't.

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to: