Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:11:40PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:34:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > We made a promise to users; and even called it a
> > ``contract''. Now we no longer want to keep that promise, so are we
> > going to just leave the users in the lurch, with no transition plan,
> > no support going forward? For people whoi seem to think that
> > distributing non-DFSG free software is unethical, how ethicsal is
> > this reneging on our promise?
> I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it
> is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful.
Prove that it isn't.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>