[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 08:52:12 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> said: 

> On Nov 1, 2003, at 23:39, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

>> Why are they not in seperate votes, which would be the proper
>> procedure?

> Because option B is an "amendment" of option A under A.1.1 and
> A.1.3.

	Only if they are related.  If they are related, there should
 be combinations available as options; A, B, A+B. If they are not
 related, they are on separate ballots.  And, even if it were not so,
 After B passes, there is nothing to prevent trying A again.

"The light that burns twice as bright lasts half as long, and you have
burned so very, very bright, Roy!" Doctor Eldon Tyrell, in Blade
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: