[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Nov 1, 2003, at 15:24, Branden Robinson wrote:
However, even so, that means (given):

	Option A: strike SC 5
	Option B: trivial, editorial change
	Option C: A + B
	Option D: Further Discussion

we're going to get the 'activists' voting CABD and the insecure voting

No, they might vote BACD because this sorts the substantive options in
increasing order of disruption to the Social Contract. It is irrational
to rank A above C if you're trying to be "conservative" (but not so
conservative that you rank D first, saying "damn all changes")?

Yes. If you don't want it to change, you vote D. If you don't want it to change much, you vote BD.

Reply to: