Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract
I think I agree with the comment that this amendment mixes too many
things into one proposal. For example, I agree with the generalisation
(rationale point 2) and most of the "editorial" changes, but violently
disagree with changing the use of "software" from its true meaning to
something apparently meaning "programs" (rationale point 4).
Please break this amendment up.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/