Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:01:54 +0100, Oliver Elphick <email@example.com> said:
> What you wrote is strained and unidiomatic. That is something that
> other non-native English speakers need to understand, lest they
> think it is good style and reproduce it.
So you continue to say. In my experience second and third
person usage of shall and shall not is far from strained; and abounds
all over literary works. And your arrogance is showing again.
I am not going to post on this thread again; I have no
intention of taking up time on this silly notpicking; we have a vote
"Have you got a 27 B stroke 6?"
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C