Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:18:36 -0400 (EDT), Joe Nahmias <email@example.com> said:
>> Do not erase anything between the lines below and do not change the
>> choice names.
> Out of curiousity, do you deal with this situation, and if so how?
The ballot is rejected as corrupt.
>> signed) with your key that is in the Debian keyring. Do _NOT_
>> encrypt your ballot; the voting mechanism shall not be able to
>> decrypt your message.
> s/shall not be able/will be unable/
>> Proposal B: Clarifies status of non-technical documents. Does *not
>> * create a class of Foundation Documents.
> weird wrapping... anyone else see this, or is it just me? actually,
> i checked the archives, it's messed up there as well.
Should be better the next time around.
Grinnell's Law of Labor Laxity: At all times, for any task, you have
not got enough done today.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C