Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:37:51PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Sorry, but I think your logic here is strange. Why do you think
> that the amendment is superfluous? Do you claim that you version
> and John's version are the same?
Superfluous does not mean equivalent.
As for why, Manoj already expressed his reasoning in the text you quoted
in your message:
> > ... this amendment is superfluous, since if less than R
> > votes are cast, then no option gets R votes, so all options are
> > discarded, and the vote is invalidated anyway.
Personally, I wouldn't argue what Manoj has argued (instead, I argue
that John's proposal is harmful to the voting process), but you did ask.